Sunday, December 10, 2006

Shady Film-Maker Edits Footage of Flordia Congresswoman

India: Dire Need for Extra Small Condoms

Clinton Adminstration Spied on Princess Diana

Germany: Polonium Trail Reaches Hamburg

Sri Lanka: 110 Killed in Fighting

Algeria: Bomb Attack Kills 1

Louisiana: Jefferson Re-Elected by Filth-Loving New Oreans Citizens

Carter's Anti-Semitism Too Much, Even for His Friends

Will Bloomberg Run a Liberal-Independent Race for President?

Saturday, December 9, 2006

Loony College Protester Put in Her Place

You'll be amazed at how low the college admission standards have fallen. This girl doesn't even know that Saddam Hussein is responsible for the death of over a million people or who the Kurds are.
Yet she is out protesting against our military and mindlessly vomiting up the liberal pap that has been shoved down her throat by her brain-washing professors.
But most of all, this video proves that Liberal chicks are ugly and wear skimpy tops to try and make up for this shortcoming. Conservative chicks are hot and don't have to do that.
This skank should stop protesting and go back to listening to Reggaeton.

Most Expensive Senate Races of 2006


10. Nebraska: $18,800,051

Pete Ricketts (R.) Spent: $11,302,078 Raised: $12,997,458
Ben Nelson (D.) Spent: $7,497,973 Raised: $7,668,661

9. Florida: $18,855,996
Bill Nelson (D.) Spent: $11,085,250 Raised: $17,704,022
Katherine Harris (R.) Spent: $7,737,906 Raised: $8,783,508
Other Spent: $32,840 Raised: $43,177

8. Ohio: $20,762,238
Mike DeWine (R.) Spent: $11,807,805 Raised: $13,962,005
Sherrod Brown (D.) Spent: $8,954,433 Raised: $7,689,115

7. Washington: $22,548,549
Maria Cantwell (D.) Spent: $13,803,318 Raised: $18,236,993
Michael McGavick (R.) Spent: $8,610,285 Raised: $9,568,239
Other Spent: $134,946 Raised: $1,339,407

6. Arizona: $23,830,520
Jim Pederson (D.) Spent: $12,314,616 Raised: $12,406,902
Jon Kyl (R.) Spent: $11,515,904 Raised: $13,713,968

5. Tennessee: $24,803,651
Bob Corker (R.) Spent: $14,200,790 Raised: $15,173,962
Harold Ford, Jr. (D.) Spent: $10,602,861 Raised: $9,886,998

4. Connecticut: $26,160,754
Joseph Lieberman (I.) Spent: $13,362,421 Raised: $16,822,226
Ned Lamont (D.) Spent: $12,648,793 Raised: $13,898,217
Other Spent: $149,540 Raised: $202,938

3. Missouri: $27,886,361
Jim Talent (R.) Spent: $19,408,892 Raised: $22,070,958
Claire McCaskill (D.) Spent: $8,475,845 Raised: $9,124,019
Other Spent: $1,624 Raised: $202,938

2. Pennsylvania: $37,767,899
Rick Santorum (R.) Spent: $24,101,782 Raised: $26,323,111
Bob Casey (D.) Spent: $13,666,117 Raised: $16,348,820

1. New York: $40,749,449
Hillary Clinton (D.) Spent: $35,921,038 Raised: $49,588,100
John Spencer (R.) Spent: $4,796,224 Raised: $5,138,870
Other Spent: $32,187 Raised: $54,856


A Convenient List of Liberal Lies, and How to Correct Them

I found this on BoycottLiberalism.com

Top Ten Liberal Lies

1. Count Every Vote- This was the mantra of the Al Gore campaign after the 2000 presidential election, when they were hand counting votes in 3 highly Democratic counties, while at the same time trying to disqualify military votes. In effect they were trying to change the rules of the election after the election had taken place, which violated federal election law. A liberal Florida Supreme Court ruled in the favor of the Gore Campaign until the U.S. Supreme Court put a stop to it. To this very day, liberals actually believe George Bush stole the election.

2. There is a vast right wing conspiracy- There is a far right wing in the Republican Party, but it is a small fringe element. However, there is a far left wing in this country and it is a large part of the main stream of the Democratic party. Remember when Hillary Clinton went on the Today Show and responded to the allegation of an affair between her husband (President Clinton) and an intern (Monica Lewinsky) as untrue and blamed it on a Right Wing Conspiracy? Over the past ten years Tom Daschle, Nancy Pelosi, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Al Gore, Mario Cuomo, Richard Gephardt and Jesse Jackson have been the loudest and most influential voices in the Democratic party. Are any of these people Moderates? Also please note, there is a liberal bias in the media. You might make the argument that there is a vast left wing conspiracy.

3. This is a tax break for the rich- This is class warfare at it's finest. If a person earning $40,000 a year gets a 10% tax reduction and a person earning $1,000,000 per year gets a 1% tax reduction- the person earning $1,000,000 will get a much greater tax break. Tom Daschle and Richard Gephardt once stood next to a car in front of the Capital Building holding up a muffler. They made a statement that a proposed George Bush tax cut would allow the rich to buy a new car and the average American to buy a muffler. This is a strategy Democrats use on every Republican proposed tax cut. They stop everyone from getting a reduction in their taxes by using class warfare. Please note, tax reductions are not an entitlement program.

4. There is no liberal bias in the media- For close to 50 years the news in America was controlled by ABC, NBC and CBS. In the last 20 years CNN came on to the scene. This is pretty much comparable to the BBC in Europe and AL Jazzera in the Arab world today. It was in the last 6 years when Fox News and other cable news networks were born to give a more balanced approach to news analysis. However, if you look at the major networks today, they are still run by the left. Tim Russert, the President of NBC News, at one time worked for Mario Cuomo. The top players at ABC News are Peter Jennings, George Stephanopolous, Sam Donaldson and Cokie Roberts- hardly conservatives. Lets not forget the statement the President of ABC News made after September 11th. CBS News has Dan Rather and Bob Schieffer- more non-conservatives. All you have to say about CNN is that it was created by Ted Turner. In print media there is the Los Angeles Times in California, The New York Times in New York and The Atlanta Journal Constitution in Georgia. These have been the major newspapers in our most populous cities for many years and their reporting has a liberal bias.

5. Republicans want to cut school lunch programs- This was the attack leveled by Democrats against the Republicans during a budget battle in 1995. Democrats proposed a double digit increase in funding for school lunch programs, while Republican proposed a more modest increase. To put this in perspective, you must ask this question. How many people get a double digit increase in their pay each year? Democrats called the Republican proposal a cut and charged they wanted to starve children, because the proposal was less than what Democrats proposed. Please note, the Republican proposal called for an increase in funding. The media printed the story, never challenging it, even though it was not true. This became famous for when does an increase become a cut- only in Washington DC.

6. I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Monica Lewinsky- We all know the truth here. There is nothing to be added- except that it was not a vast right wing conspiracy.

7. Republicans are mean spirited and want to throw the poor out on the street- This was a charge leveled by Democrats against Republicans when they proposed time limits for receiving welfare. Polls show that the majority of Americans believe in time restrictions for welfare recipients. Republicans know that to escape poverty it takes education, hard work and discipline. The greatness of this country rests in its freedom and that within one generation a person can rise from poverty to obtain great wealth. Allowing endless dependency on an entitlement program has trapped many in poverty. Why would Democrats want to keep anyone dependent on an entitlement program like welfare? How many people on welfare vote Republican?

8. I support the military- It has been well documented that when it comes to voting for military funding- liberals would much rather spend money on social programs. First you must understand their rational. Approximately 10% of the population in the United States is poor, which is about 30 million Americans. There are approximately one million Americans serving in the military. If only 1 in 5 of the poor vote, that equals about six million votes as compared to one million votes from the military. There are two relevant questions here. What percent of the poor vote Republican? How close was the 2000 Presidential Election? This leads directly to the answer of why would liberals rather appropriate money to social programs than to the defense of our country. Please note, the defense of our country is a primary, if not the primary responsibility of our government. If we don't protect the country, we may not have a country or our freedom.

9. Privatizing social security is risky. Contribute $300 a month to Social Security and you may get $1,800 a month when you retire. Sound like a good deal? There was a story about Dick Gephardt's mother living on Social Security and having numerous checks she had written returned for insufficient funds. Gephardt politicized the event by stating that this was an example of why Social Security should not be privatized, because if it were not for Social Security his mother would have been much worse off. Please note that the S & P 500 has returned more than 10% over it's lifetime. Therefore- if you invested $300 a month in an S & P 500 mutual fund for 40 years at the end of that time (enter these numbers into any compound interest calculator) you would have approximately 2 million dollars (Please note that these are conservative numbers). This means you could withdraw almost $200,000 or 10 percent a year and never exhaust your money. Break that down and it is $20, 000 a month. Social Security does not sound so good any longer. Please be advised that the key to obtaining wealth is systematically investing for the long term. There is no quick sure fire scheme to getting rich. If Gephardt's mother had been investing in mutual funds her entire life instead of Social Security- she would have been much better off at the present. Also, please be advised that privatizing Social Security helps the poor the more than anyone. The rich invest money in 401K plans. The poor, the clerk at a convenience store or a customer service representative doesn't have excess funds to invest and so their only investment vehicle is Security Security, which in reality is just a bond fund.

10. Trickle down economics does not work- Money in the hands of people stimulates the economy, whether they are rich or poor. The problem- how to you put money in the hands of the poor? Transfer of more wealth from the rich to the poor each year? This would only create greater dependency on entitlements and give lessen the incentive to achieve. Give the poor greater tax cuts? You can only cut the taxes for the poor by so much, because they don't pay much in taxes. When Tom Daschle said that the result of a proposed Bush tax cut would mean that a rich person would be able to buy a new car, without realizing it, he proved the theory of Trickle Down Economics. The person selling that car would generate income that he would otherwise not have had. Please note that if that person sells enough cars, he will gain wealth. If tax rates in this county were at 75% what would happen to the economy? The answer is that no one would have money to spend on anything except housing and food. The result would be that businesses everywhere would fail, because no one would have money to buy clothes, electronics, entertainment, repairs for their homes or cars, go on vacation..... If they did buy such things, they would have to go in to debt to do so. How would this help the working class or the poor? Please note the average taxpayer, pays roughly 50% of their income in taxes. After the attack on September 11th, Hillary Clinton said, "come to New York and spend money." She knew if people stopped coming to New York and spending money, businesses would fail and the economy in New York would suffer a great downturn, which would hurt the average working family. This is interesting considering that liberals are for tax hikes and against tax cuts. The only thing that helps the working class is a strong economy. It gives the average worker more freedom and more bargaining power. When the financial sector was booming from 1987 through 1989, workers were getting bonuses, overtime and stock options. When the financial sector suffered a downturn in 1990, it trickled down. There were no more bonuses, overtime, stock options and their were layoffs.


For the rest of the list, which goes up to 33 liberal lies, visit BoycottLiberalism.com

Fanning Class Hatred is all Democrats Have to Offer

Iraq Study Group Asks us to Copy the Mistakes of Vietnam

Illinois: American Islamist Tries to Commit Mass-Murder in Rockford Mall

Hilarious! Whiny Liberal Chick Has a Bug up Her Butt

At least it's about something really important, like the animation in a theater before the movie starts, asking you turn off your cellphone.

This dame ought to stick to what she does best, which is being a below-average-looking numb-skull, and let more intelligent people comment on our society's ills.

Friday, December 8, 2006

A Future Full of Fatsos

Some bleak news on the health of our country:

It's no secret that American kids eat too much. Now, a new study provides some specific numbers that could help fight the obesity epidemic.

Over a 10-year period, the average child consumed up to 165 calories more than he or she needed each day -- the equivalent of an entire can of soda. And the fattest teens took in as many as 1,000 calories more each day than they needed -- almost as much as two Big Macs.

Many American kids are suffering from an "energy gap," in which they take in more calories than they burn through growth and daily living. And the trend won't be easy to reverse, said the study's lead author, Dr. Y. Claire Wang, a researcher at the Harvard School of Public Health.

"Closing this energy gap in order to reverse the childhood obesity epidemic will require more than one single intervention," Wang said. "Just panicking or just screaming about how bad the epidemic has become is probably not going to be enough."

An estimated one in three American kids is either obese -- a step beyond overweight -- or in danger of becoming obese, Wang said. And one in eight or nine children is actually obese.

"A typical U.S. teen has gained an excess of 10 pounds over the body weight that is considered normal," Wang said. At the same time, teens haven't gotten taller.

In what is apparently the first study of its kind, Wang and her colleagues tried to determine just how much excess food children are consuming. They examined several federal studies and extrapolated the "energy gap" for different age ranges.

From 1988 to 1994, children aged 2 to 7 consumed between 110 and 165 calories more than they needed each day, resulting in a weight gain -- not related to growth -- of almost a pound a year, the researchers found.

The researchers also found that from 1999 to 2002, obese children 12 to 17 years old took in an average of 678 to 1,017 extra calories a day, amounting to an entire excess weight gain of 58 pounds.

The study is published in the December issue of the journal Pediatrics.

"Prevention is the most important thing," Wang said. Children "start having a small energy gap, then it becomes bigger over time. [We] need to start early and establish healthy habits. It requires more than just one strategy -- everyone has to participate, including the government, community, schools, families, and the food and beverage industries."

As for specific strategies, research suggests that cutting TV viewing by an hour a day could reduce food intake by about 160 calories, Wang said.

Karen A. Donato is coordinator of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Obesity Education Initiative, and she's familiar with the new study findings. She said the study shows that a relatively small number of calories over time can tip the energy balance toward overweight.

"Parents in particular need to be aware as their children grow that they not consume excessive calories from large portions and sugar-sweetened beverages, and that they remain physically active and not watch a lot of TV," Donato said. "A relatively small number of calories over time can tip the energy balance towards overweight. Doctors need to alert parents that they need to have healthy foods in their home and stay active with their children."

Source: http://health.msn.com/

California: Silvestre Reyes, Latest Democrat Crook

Why Nature Made Women Lack a Sense of Humor

Peace love and anti-semitism?
Simple Minded Liberals Interviewed During 2005 Innauguration

News Flash!!! Arab League Secretary General Just Loves Iraq Study Group Report

More Perversion Taught in Schools

Euro-Socialists Conive to Work With US Democrats

Hollywood Invaded by Hairy-Armpit-Women

Thursday, December 7, 2006

Sunday, December 3, 2006

Top 25 Most Dangerous Cities in America

According to Morgan Quitno.

1. St. Louis, MO
2. Detroit, MI
3. Flint, MI
4. Compton, CA
5. Camden, NJ
6. Birmingham, AL
7. Cleveland, OH
8. Oakland, CA
9. Youngstown, OH
10. Gary, IN
11. Richmond, CA
12. Baltimore, MD
13. Memphis, TN
14. Trenton, NJ
15. Richmond, VA
16. Kansas City, MO
17. Atlanta, GA
18. Cincinnati, OH
19. Washington, DC
20. North Charleston, SC
21. Reading, PA
22. Newark, NJ
23. Little Rock, AR
24. San Bernardino, CA
25. Orlando, FL

Top 25 Safest Cities in America

According to the Morgan Quitno 13th Annual America's Safest Awards .

1. Brick, NJ
2. Amherst, NY
3. Mission Viejo, CA
4. Newton, MA
5. Troy, MI
6. Colonie, NY
7. Irvine, CA
8. Cary, NC
9. Greece, NY
10. Coral Springs, FL
11. Thousand Oaks, CA
12. Orem, UT
13. Round Rock, TX
14. Dover, NJ
15. Lake Forest, CA
16. Sterling Heights, MI
17. Simi Valley, CA
18. Roswell, GA
19. Lee's Summit, MO
20. Broken Arrow, OK
21. Chino Hills, GA
22. Gilbert, AZ
23. Edison, NJ
24. Cranston, RI
25. Port St. Lucie, FL

Friday, December 1, 2006

John Kerry Least Popular of Potential Presidential Candidates

#1 Most Important Story of 2006


As the year draws to an end, The Interested American would like to leave you with some images of the most important news story of 2006.


The Interested Archive