Washington Post Attacks GOP for Being Against PervScan and Airport Groping

Do you like bizarre, bass-ackwards reading that makes no sense?
Would you like to get some insight into how a Liberal priss thinks about Obama Ghraib?
Help yourself to this attempt at writing by Dana Milbank:
Does the GOP remember Sept. 11?

Related articles

• How would private security change the porno-scan or grope problem? (americablog.com)
• Privatize this! Corporate groping preferred to TSA groping? (dailykos.com)
• Rush: Obama groping flyers to punish them for voting GOP - 'This is all about control... (gunnyg.wordpress.com)
• Milbank: GOP Has Entered The 'Post-Post-9/11 Era' (huffingtonpost.com)
• Why Congress Isn't So Concerned With TSA Nude Scans & Gropes: They Get To Skip Them (techdirt.com)
• US man slips into perv scanner-busting undies (go.theregister.com)
• Andy Ostroy: I Wanna Be Scanned and Groped (huffingtonpost.com)
• The Real Airport Security Debate: Would You Rather Be Groped or Zapped? (politicsdaily.com)
• Daily Grope Up (emergentchaos.com)
• No. 24: Dana Milbank (salon.com)

77% Think Government Spending is the Problem, Not Tax Payer 'Selfishness'

Which is a better problem in the United States today?
Voters unwilling to pay enough in taxes	14%
Politicians unwilling to control government spending	77%
Not sure Rasmussen Reports	8%

The 14% who blame the workers of this country for not paying enough taxes are mostly life-long welfare leeches or rich liberals who know the ropes when it comes to not paying taxes even though they expect us to keep paying more and more of our money for their

Text of the Speech Sarah Palin Was Prevented From Giving by NY Liberals

I am honored to be with you and with leaders from across this great country - leaders from different faiths and political parties united in a single voice of outrage.

Tomorrow, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will come to New York - to the heart of what he calls the Great Satan - and speak freely in this, a country whose demise he has called for.

Ahmadinejad may choose his words carefully, but underneath all of the rhetoric is an agenda that threatens all who seek a safer and freer world. We gather here today to highlight the Iranian dictator's intentions and to call for action to thwart him.
He must be stopped.

The world must awake to the threat this man poses to all of us. Ahmadinejad denies that the Holocaust ever took place. He dreams of being an agent in a "Final Solution" - the elimination of the Jewish people. He has called Israel a "stinking corpse" that is "on its way to annihilation."

Such talk cannot be dismissed as the ravings of a madman -not when Iran just this summer tested long-range Shahab-3 missiles capable of striking Tel Aviv, not when the Iranian nuclear program is nearing completion, and not when Iran sponsors terrorists that threaten and kill innocent people around the world.

The Iranian government wants nuclear weapons. The International Atomic Energy Agency reports that Iran is running at least 3,800 centrifuges and that its uranium enrichment capacity is rapidly improving. According to news reports, U.S. intelligence agencies believe the Iranians may have enough nuclear material to produce a bomb within a year.

The world has condemned these activities. The United Nations Security Council has demanded that Iran suspend its illegal nuclear enrichment activities. It has levied three rounds of sanctions. How has Ahmadinejad responded? With the declaration that the "Iranian nation would not retreat one iota" from its nuclear program.

So, what should we do about this growing threat? First, we must succeed in Iraq. If we fail there, it will jeopardize the democracy the Iraqis have worked so hard to build, and empower the extremists in neighboring Iran. Iran has armed and trained terrorists who have killed our soldiers in Iraq, and it is Iran that would benefit from an American defeat in Iraq.

If we retreat without leaving a stable Iraq, Iran's nuclear ambitions will be bolstered. If Iran acquires nuclear weapons ? they could share them tomorrow with the terrorists they finance, arm, and train today. Iranian nuclear weapons would set off a dangerous regional nuclear arms race that would make all of us less safe.

But Iran is not only a regional threat; it threatens the entire world. It is the no. 1 state sponsor of terrorism. It sponsors the world's most vicious terrorist groups, Hamas and Hezbollah. Together, Iran and its terrorists are responsible for the deaths of Americans in Lebanon in the 1980s, in Saudi Arabia in the 1990s, and in Iraq today. They have murdered Iraqis, Lebanese, Palestinians, and other Muslims who have resisted Iran's desire to dominate the region. They have persecuted countless people simply because they are Jewish.

Iran is responsible for attacks not only on Israelis, but on Jews living as far away as Argentina. Anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial are part of Iran's official ideology and murder is part of its official policy. Not even Iranian citizens are safe from their government's threat to those who want to live, work, and worship in peace. Politically-motivated abductions, torture, death by stoning, flogging, and amputations are just some of its state-sanctioned punishments.

It is said that the measure of a country is the treatment of its most vulnerable citizens. By that standard, the Iranian government is both oppressive and barbaric. Under Ahmadinejad's rule, Iranian women are some of the most vulnerable citizens.

If an Iranian woman shows too much hair in public, she risks being beaten or killed. If she walks down a public street in clothing that violates the state dress code, she could be arrested.

But in the face of this harsh regime, the Iranian women have shown courage. Despite threats to their lives and their families, Iranian women have sought better treatment through the "One Million Signatures Campaign Demanding Changes to Discriminatory Laws." The authorities have reacted with predictable barbarism. Last year, women's rights activist Delaram Ali was sentenced to 20 lashes and 10 months in prison for committing the crime of "propaganda against the system." After international protests, the judiciary reduced her sentence to "only" 10 lashes and 36 months in prison and then temporarily suspended her sentence. She still faces the threat of imprisonment.

Earlier this year, Senator Clinton said that "Iran is seeking nuclear weapons, and the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps is in the forefront of that" effort. Senator Clinton argued that part of our response must include stronger sanctions, including the designation of the IRGC as a terrorist organization. John McCain and I could not agree more.

Senator Clinton understands the nature of this threat and what we must do to confront it. This is an issue that should unite all Americans. Iran should not be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons. Period. And in a single voice, we must be loud enough for the whole world to hear: Stop Iran!
Only by working together, across national, religious, and political differences, can we alter this regime's dangerous behavior. Iran has many vulnerabilities, including a regime weakened by sanctions and a population eager to embrace opportunities with the West. We must increase economic pressure to change Iran's behavior.

Tomorrow, Ahmadinejad will come to New York. On our soil, he will exercise the right of freedom of speech - a right he denies his own people. He will share his hateful agenda with the world. Our task is to focus the world on what can be done to stop him.

We must rally the world to press for truly tough sanctions at the U.N. or with our allies if Iran's allies continue to block action in the U.N. We must start with restrictions on Iran's refined petroleum imports. We must reduce our dependency on foreign oil to weaken Iran's economic influence.
We must target the regime's assets abroad; bank accounts, investments, and trading partners.

President Ahmadinejad should be held accountable for inciting genocide, a crime under international law.

We must sanction Iran's Central Bank and the Revolutionary Guard Corps -which no one should doubt is a terrorist organization. Together, we can stop Iran's nuclear program.

Senator McCain has made a solemn commitment that I strongly endorse: Never again will we risk another Holocaust. And this is not a wish, a request, or a plea to Israel's enemies. This is a promise that the United States and Israel will honor, against any enemy who cares to test us. It is John McCain's promise and it is my promise.

Thank you.

Canada: Conservatives Enjoy 14 pt Lead

If a federal election were held tomorrow, which one of the following parties would you be most likely to support in your constituency?

	Sept. 18	Sept. 12	Sept. 9	Aug. 2008
Conservative	38%	39%	38%	36%
Liberal	24%	23%	24%	28%
New Democratic Party	19%	18%	21%	18%
Green	10%	10%	7%	8%
Bloc Québécois	9%	9%	9%	9%
Other	1%	1%	1%	1%

Source: Angus Reid Strategies / Toronto Star
Methodology: Online interviews with 1,502 Canadian adults, conducted on Sept. 17 and Sept. 18, 2008. Margin of error is 2.9 per cent.

Wisconsin: Liberals Trying to Hack Down Cross on Private Land Because it 'Appears' to be on Public Land

Canada: Conservatives Lead by 10

If a federal election were held tomorrow, which one of the following parties would you be most likely to support in your constituency?

	Mar. 28	Mar. 2	Feb. 2008	Dec. 2007
Conservative	36%	34%	34%	33%
Liberal	26%	28%	31%	28%
New Democratic Party	18%	18%	17%	17%
Bloc Québécois	9%	10%	9%	10%
Green	9%	9%	8%	10%
Other	1%	1%	1%	2%

Source: Angus Reid Strategies
Methodology: Online interviews with 1,007 Canadian adults, conducted on Mar. 27 and Mar. 28, 2008. Margin of error is 3.1 per cent.

Michelle Malkin Chronicles Liberal's War on Our Military

Canada: Conservatives Strengthen Lead

If a federal election were held tomorrow, which one of the following parties would you be most likely to support in your constituency?

	Mar. 2	Feb. 18	Dec. 2007	Oct. 2007
Conservative	34%	34%	33%	34%
Liberal	28%	31%	28%	29%
New Democratic Party	18%	17%	17%	17%
Bloc Québécois	10%	9%	10%	9%
Green	9%	8%	10%	9%
Other	1%	1%	2%	2%

Source: Angus Reid Strategies
Methodology: Online interviews with 1,036 Canadian adults, conducted on Feb. 20 to Mar. 2, 2008. Margin of error is 3.0 per cent.

Maryland: Democrats Now Want to Take People's Gift Certificate Money

When You Want the Very Worst

These low-lifes scored a 'perfect' zero in the ACU’s 2006 Ratings of Congress (0 lowest, 100 highest). Can't wait until the 2007 ratings, maybe one of these slugs can make it up to a 5.

Tammy Baldwin (D-WI)
Lane Evans (D-IL)
Martin Meehan (D-MA)
Janice Schakowsky (D-IL)
Albio Sires (D-NJ) Unfortunately, this a-hole is my Congressman.
Diane Watson (D-CA)

The Insanity of Bush Hatred

Bush hatred is different. It's not that this time members of the intellectual class have been swept away by passion and become votaries of anger and loathing. Alas, intellectuals have always been prone to employ their learning and fine words to whip up resentment and demonize the competition. Bush hatred, however, is distinguished by the pride intellectuals have taken in their hatred, openly endorsing it as a virtue and enthusiastically proclaiming that their hatred is not only a rational response to the president and his administration but a mark of good moral hygiene.

This distinguishing feature of Bush hatred was brought home to me on a recent visit to Princeton University. I had been invited to appear on a panel to debate the ideas in Princeton professor and American Prospect editor Paul Starr's excellent new book, "Freedom's Power: The True Force of Liberalism." To put in context Prof. Starr's grounding of contemporary progressivism in the larger liberal tradition, I recounted to the Princeton audience an exchange at a dinner I hosted in Washington in June 2004 for several distinguished progressive scholars, journalists, and policy analysts.

To get the conversation rolling at that D.C. dinner--and perhaps mischievously--I wondered aloud whether Bush hatred had not made rational discussion of politics in Washington all but impossible. One guest responded in a loud, seething, in-your-face voice, "What's irrational about hating George W. Bush?" His vehemence caused his fellow progressives to gather around and lean in, like kids on a playground who see a fight brewing.

Source: Wall Street Journal Online

MoveOn.org to Pay $77,000 More for Disgraceful Ad

This would be the full price the NY Times requires from other political ads.

Liberal Enviro-Nuts Steal Pet Rabbit From Preschool

"Somebody stoled him. I'm sad."

—5-year-old Zion

Liberals Blow Up Mexican Oil Pipeline

Canada: Conservatives Lead by 4

If a federal election were held tomorrow, which one of the following parties would you be most likely to support in your constituency?

	Aug. 23	Jul. 18	Jun. 18	May 23
Conservative	33%	33%	34%	35%
Liberal	29%	28%	27%	28%
New Democratic Party	19%	19%	19%	18%
Bloc Québécois	9%	9%	10%	9%
Green	9%	8%	8%	9%
Other	1%	3%	1%	1%

Source: Angus Reid Strategies
Methodology: Online interviews with 2,133 Canadian adults, conducted from Aug. 21 to Aug. 23, 2007. Margin of error is 2.1 per cent.

Liberals Targeting 38 Moderate Democrats in Congress

This is the list:

Jason Altmire, PA-04
Brian Baird, WA-03 (he didn't vote for FISA, but he just switched his position and now supports the surge)
John Barrow, GA-12
Melissa Bean, IL-08
Dan Boren, OK-02
Leonard Boswell, IA-03
Alan Boyd, FL-02
Chris Carney, PA-10
Ben Chandler, KY-06
Jim Cooper, TN-05
Jim Costa, CA-20
Bud Cramer, AL-05
Henry Cuellar, TX-28
Lamar Davis, TN-04
Joe Donnelly, IN-02
Chet Edwards, TX-17
Brad Ellsworth, IN-08
Bob Etheridge, NC-02
Bart Gordon, TN-06
Stephanie Herseth, SD-AL
Baron Hill, IN-09
Nick Lampson, TX-22
Dan Lipinski, IL-03
Jim Marshall, GA-08
Jim Matheson, UT-02
Mike McIntyre, NC-07
Charlie Melancon, LA-03
Colin Peterson, MN-07
Earl Pomeroy, ND-AL
Ciro Rodriguez, TX-23
Mike Ross, AR-04
John Salazar, CO-03
Heath Shuler, NC-11
Vic Snyder, AR-02
Zack Space, OH-18
John Tanner, TN-08
Gene Taylor, MS-04
Tim Walz, MN-01
Charlie Wilson, OH-06

Democrats Blame Bush for Newark Shooting

Telluride's 'Impeach Bush' Spectacle Backfires: Vacationers Cancel

Attacks on Bush Helps America's Enemies

Denmark: Liberals Lead by 1.5 pts

What party would you support in the next general election?

	Jun. 30	Jun. 23	Jun. 16
Left, Liberal Party of Denmark (V)	27.0%	24.2%	27.0%
Social Democracy in Denmark (SD)	25.5%	26.6%	25.5%
Danish People’s Party (DF)	12.8%	12.0%	11.3%
Socialist People’s Party (SF)	8.7%	9.3%	8.1%
New Alliance (NA)	7.8%	6.6%	9.3%
Conservative People’s Party (KF)	6.9%	10.0%	8.5%
Radical Left-Social Liberal Party (RV)	6.2%	6.3%	5.7%
Unity List-The Red Greens (EL)	3.6%	3.3%	2.9%
Christian Democrats (KD)	0.8%	1.1%	0.7%
Centre-Democrats (CD)	--	0.4%	0.3%
Minority Party (M)	--	--	0.1%

Source: Catinét Research / Ritzau
Methodology: Interviews with 1,058 Dane adults, conducted from Jun. 25 to Jun. 30, 2007. Margin of error is 2.7 per cent.