Showing posts with label Supreme Court. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Supreme Court. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 7, 2009

Only 27% Want Another 'Stimulus' Package

Do you favor or oppose another economic stimulus package?

Favor

27%

Oppose

60%

Not sure

13%



Rasmussen Reports
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Sotomayor Support Falls 12 pts.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey, conducted on the two nights following the Supreme Court decision, finds that 37% now believe Sotomayor should be confirmed while 39% disagree.

Two weeks ago, the numbers were much brighter for the nominee. At that time, 42% favored confirmation, and 34% were opposed.

Source: Rasmussen Reports
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Monday, June 29, 2009

Honduras: Zelaya Ousted

Manuel ZelayaImage via Wikipedia

It's funny that some people are reporting this as a military 'coup' when in fact it was President Manuel Zelaya who attempted a coup. The military was just doing what the Honduras Supreme Court ordered it to do, which was to remove Zelaya.
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Supreme Court Overturns Sotomayor's Racist Decision

The Supreme Court ruled Monday that white firefighters in New Haven, Conn., were unfairly

Judge Sonia SotomayorImage by talkradionews via Flickr

denied promotions because of their race, reversing a decision that high court nominee Sonia Sotomayor endorsed as an appeals court judge. New Haven was wrong to scrap a promotion exam because no African-Americans and only two Hispanic firefighters were likely to be made lieutenants or captains based on the results, the court said Monday in a 5-4 decision. The city said that it had acted to avoid a lawsuit from minorities.


Washington Post



Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Only 23% Unhappy With Supreme Court

How would you rate the way the Supreme Court is doing its job?

Excellent

6%

Good

32%

Fair

40%

Poor

16%

Not Sure

7%


Rasmussen Reports

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Minnesota Recount May be Unconstitutional

The 2000 Supreme Court decision may have an effect on the 2008 (going into 2009) Minnesota senate race:
By a vote of 7-2, Bush v. Gore (2000) ruled that Florida's recount violated the principle that all votes must be treated uniformly. Applying precedents dating to the 1960s, the Court found that the Equal Protection Clause meant that ballots must be treated so as to give every vote equal weight. A state may not, by "arbitrary and disparate treatment, value one person's vote over that of another." Florida's lack of standards produced "unequal evaluation of ballots in several respects." The state's supreme court "ratified this uneven treatment" and created more of its own, and was unconstitutional.
Wall Street Journal

Tuesday, December 2, 2008

Supreme Court Justice Stevens May Stay to Break Records

Stevens is the eighth longest-serving Justice in the history of the Court. If he continues on the Court beyond July 15, 2012, he will surpass the current record of 36 years and 209 days held by former Justice William O. Douglas.
Bench Memos

Monday, July 28, 2008

Recent Liberal Rulings Hurt Supreme Court's Image

Do you approve or disapprove of the way the United States Supreme Court is handling its job?

Jul. 2008

Aug. 2007

Apr. 2007

Approve

39%

45%

58%

Disapprove

43%

37%

27%

Unsure

18%

17%

15%

Source: Quinnipiac University Polling Institute
Methodology: Telephone interviews with 1,783 registered American voters, conducted from Jul. 8 to Jul. 13, 2008. Margin of error is 2.3 per cent.

Monday, June 30, 2008

Rasmussen Poll: Supreme Court Viewed More Favorabley After Gun Control Ruling

How would you rate the way the Supreme Court is doing its job?

Excellent

5%

Good

29%

Fair

45%

Poor

19%

Not Sure

3%

Monday, June 23, 2008

Americans Against Supreme Court Ruling Favoring Terrorists

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that non-citizens suspected of terrorism who are being held in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, should be allowed to challenge their detentions in the U.S. civilian court system. Supporters of this ruling say it provides detainees with basic constitutional rights. Critics of the ruling say only special military tribunals should be allowed, because hearings in open court could compromise terrorism investigations. What’s your view—do you think these detainees should or should not be able to challenge their detentions in the civilian court system?

Should

34%

Should not

61%

No opinion

6%

Source: TNS / Washington Post / ABC News
Methodology: Telephone interviews with 1,125 American adults, conducted from Jun. 12 to Jun. 15, 2008. Margin of error is 3 per cent.

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

Only 19% Disapprove of Supreme Court

How would you rate the way the Supreme Court is doing its job?

Excellent

7%

Good

34%

Fair

37%

Poor

19%

Not Sure

3%

Is Obama Bribing Hillary With a Spot on Supreme Court?

Monday, May 19, 2008

Supreme Court Upholds Anti-Childporn Law

David Souter and Ruth Bader Ginsburg voted against the majority, standing up for the rights of child predators.

The Interested Archive