Image by BMigulski via Flickr
The freeze began thawing in February at Jolie's initiative, according to a family friend. Jolie's love stud Brad Pitt "has been supportive - a key factor in her reaching out," the friend blabs.
Philly.com
Image by BMigulski via Flickr
The freeze began thawing in February at Jolie's initiative, according to a family friend. Jolie's love stud Brad Pitt "has been supportive - a key factor in her reaching out," the friend blabs.
Dobbs says he will continue to express his vocal opinions through "empirical thought and forthright analysis," which could mean he's landed a job opportunity at another network. Rumors have been swirling of a possible Lou Dobbs show at Rupert Murdoch's FOX Business Network, the new financial channel of sister-network FOX News Channel. Neither FOX News nor Dobbs have announced intentions for the reporter to move to the FOX News family.
Heading the team is David Samson. He was on McGreevey’s transition team in 2001 as well and went on to become his attorney general. Another veteran of the McGreevey transition is Al Koeppe, a former executive and current head of the Newark Alliance. And then there’s John McCormac, who was McGreevey’s treasurer and is now the Democratic mayor of Woodbridge. Also representing the Democratic Party is state Sen. Sandra Cunningham of Hudson County.
New Jersey Survey of 1,000 Likely Voters
October 29, 2009
| 2009 New Jersey Governor Race | |
|---|---|
Chris Christie (R) | 46% |
Jon Corzine (D) | 43% |
Chris Daggett (I) | 8% |
Not Sure | 3% |
Republican Christopher Christie has a seven point lead, 43%-35%, over Gov. Jon Corzine among likely voters, with 8% for independent Christopher Daggett, according to a poll conducted by Neighborhood Research
It has been 10 years since New Zealand’s alcohol purchasing age was lowered from 20 to 18. Overall, do you believe this has had… ?
| A positive effect on New Zealand society | 5% |
| A negative effect | 74% |
| No effect at all | 17% |
| Both a positive and negative effect | 1% |
| Don’t know | 4% |
The Law Commission has recently reviewed New Zealand’s alcohol laws. One of the recommendations they have made is a split purchasing age, where 18 year-olds can buy alcohol in bars and restaurants, but you have to be at least 20 to buy alcohol from liquor outlets and other off-license premises. Do you agree or disagree with this recommendation?
| Agree | 51% |
| Disagree | 46% |
| Neither | 2% |
| Don’t know | 1% |
Source: Research New Zealand
Methodology: Telephone interviews with 500 New Zealand voters, conducted from Sept. 8 to Sept. 10, 2009. Margin of error is 4.5 per cent.
Image via Wikipedia
Are you planning on being immunized against the Swine Flu (H1N1)?
| CAN | USA | BRI | |
| Yes | 36% | 26% | 20% |
| No | 39% | 51% | 50% |
| Not sure | 24% | 23% | 30% |
Source: Angus Reid Strategies
Methodology: Online interviews with 1,002 Canadian adults, 1,006 American adults, and 2,000 British adults, conducted from Oct. 22 to Oct. 26, 2009. Margins of error range from 2.2 per cent to 3.1 per cent.
Image by Steve Rhodes via Flickr
Surveys of 1,000 Likely Voters
October 14-15 & 18-19, 2009
| Issue | Democrats | Republicans |
|---|---|---|
Health Care | 40% | 46% |
Education | 38% | 43% |
Social Security | 37% | 45% |
Taxes | 35% | 50% |
Economy | 35% | 49% |
Abortion | 35% | 47% |
Immigration | 33% | 40% |
Nat'l Security | 31% | 54% |
Iraq | 31% | 50% |
Gov't Ethics | 29% | 33% |
McCollum and Rudy Giuliani munching. Image by Getty Images via Daylife
Survey of 1,000 Likely Voters
October 19, 2009
| Election 2010: Florida Governor Race | |
|---|---|
Bill McCollum (R) | 46% |
Alex Sink (D) | 35% |
Some other candidate | 5% |
Not sure | 15% |
What party list would you vote for in the next parliamentary election?
|
| Oct. 1 | Sept. 1 | Aug. 1 |
| Civic Democratic Party (ODS) | 30.7% | 32.8% | 31.4% |
| 27.6% | 34.4% | 34.8% | |
| 13.2% | 8.3% | 6.5% | |
| 12.5% | 13.9% | 11.9% | |
| Christian and Democratic Union - Czech People’s Party (KDU-CSL) | 6.8% | 3.5% | 7.8% |
| Green Party (SZ) | 3.1% | 2.4% | 2.4% |
Source: Median
Methodology: Interviews with 1,180 Czech adults, conducted from Sept. 2 to Oct. 1, 2009. No margin of error was provided.
Image by didbygraham via Flickr
Do you approve or disapprove of Gordon Brown’s performance as Prime Minister?
| Approve | 26% |
| Disapprove | 66% |
| Not sure | 8% |
Do you approve or disapprove of David Cameron’s performance as Leader of the Opposition?
| Approve | 48% |
| Disapprove | 39% |
| Not sure | 13% |
Do you approve or disapprove of Nick Clegg’s performance as leader of the Liberal Democrats?
| Approve | 40% |
| Disapprove | 29% |
| Not sure | 32% |
Source: Angus Reid Strategies
Methodology: Online interviews with 2,077 British adults, conducted on Oct. 15 and Oct. 16, 2009. Margin of error is 2.2 per cent.
Image via Wikipedia
The most persistent rumor this week: Gov. Charlie Crist 44 percent Marco Rubio 30 percent in the race for U.S. Senate. The poll allegedly is the Florida Chamber of Commerce’s, but president Mark Wilson isn’t calling us back.
Is it true? We have no idea. But Rubio people have told us about it. Crist people have told us about it. And the accounts of the five people from both camps to whom we spoke differ by only a percentage point or two.
Source: The Miami Herald Blog
Illinois Survey of 500 Likely Voters
September 14, 2009
Kirk (R) | 41% |
Giannoulias (D) | 41% |
Other | 4% |
Not Sure | 13% |
Kirk (R) | 43% |
Jackson (D) | 39% |
Other | 4% |
Not Sure | 13% |
Kirk (R) | 43% |
Hoffman (D) | 33% |
Other | 8% |
Not Sure | 16% |
Image via Wikipedia
Would you support or oppose regularizing prostitution?
| Support | 76% |
| Oppose | 17% |
Source: Instituto Noxa / La Vanguardia
Methodology: Telephone interviews with 2,000 Spanish adults, conducted from Sept. 28 to Oct. 1, 2009. Margin of error is 2.24 per cent.
If a federal election were held tomorrow, which one of the following parties would you be most likely to support in your constituency?
| Oct. 14 | Sept. 30 | Sept. 24 | Sept. 2 | |
| Conservative | 41% | 37% | 37% | 33% |
| Liberal | 27% | 27% | 29% | 32% |
| New Democratic Party | 16% | 17% | 16% | 19% |
| Bloc Québécois | 8% | 11% | 9% | 9% |
| Green | 6% | 6% | 8% | 7% |
| Other |
Home News Tribune
"A vote for Chris Daggett is a vote for Jon Corzine," the editorial said. "Chris Christie should be the clear choice as the only candidate exhibiting the courage to meaningfully talk about what the state can't afford. He receives our endorsement."
Courier Post
"Earlier in the year Christie appeared a potential shoo-in for victory. He had built a reputation as a corruption-busting U.S. attorney, a resume that resonated with New Jerseyans terribly weary of dirty politicians in their midst. He also carried with him the promise of a cost-cutting Republican who could rein in the Trenton Democratic spending machine devouring the state.
"But that message has gotten lost. A few minor skeletons tumbled out of his closet — a poor driving record, an undisclosed loan to a co-worker. But the overriding negative perception of Christie is also entirely unfair, that he's a would-be tax cutter without a plan. Blame a poorly constructed campaign for that, not Christie.
"Fact is, Christie has offered many specific ideas on how to cut government spending, mirroring much of Gannett New Jersey's own 20-point plan to ease New Jersey's tax crush. Pension reforms, requirements for public employees to contribute more toward their benefits, a two-thirds legislative supermajority for all tax increases — they've all been proposed by Christie, along with many other initiatives."
Via PolitickerNJ
New Jersey Survey of 750 Likely Voters
October 5, 2009 Rasmussen Poll
| 2009 New Jersey Governor Race | |
|---|---|
Chris Christie (R) | 47% |
Jon Corzine (D) | 44% |
Chris Dagget (I) | 6% |
Not Sure | 3% |
Louisiana Survey of 500 Likely Voters
October 5, 2009
| 2010 Louisiana Senate Race | |
|---|---|
David Vitter (R) | 46% |
Charlie Melancon (D) | 36% |
Some Other Candidate | 5% |
Not Sure | 13% |
| 2010 Louisiana Senate Race | |
|---|---|
Jay Dardenne (R) | 46% |
Charlie Melancon (D) | 33% |
Some Other Candidate | 6% |
Not Sure | 15% |
Just over 43% of respondents said they would vote for Thompson – the former Republican governor who served from 1987 to 2001 before accepting an appointment from President George W. Bush to become secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Just over 39% said they would vote for Feingold, the Democratic senator who was first elected in 1992. Feingold’s current term expires next year and, so far, his sole announced challenger on the Republican side is David Westlake, a small business owner from Watertown.
If an election were held today, what party would you support? (Decided Voters)
|
| Sept. 2009 | Apr. 2009 |
| Hungarian Citizens Party (Fidesz) | 67% | 70% |
| Hungarian Socialist Party (MSZP) | 18% | 18% |
| Movement for a Better Hungary (Jobbik) | 10% | 4% |
| Politics Can Be Different (LMP) | 1% | n.a. |
| Alliance of Free Democrats (SZDSZ) | 1% | 2% |
| Hungarian Democratic Forum (MDF) | 1% | 2% |
Source: Median
Methodology: Interviews with 1,200 Hungarian adults, conducted from Sept. 4 to Sept. 8, 2009. Margin of error is 3 per cent.
Thinking about the Party Vote, which is for a political party, which political party would you vote for?
|
| Sept. 2009 | Jul. 2009 | Apr. 2009 |
| National | 54% | 56% | 57% |
| Labour | 33% | 31% | 31% |
| Green | 4% | 7% | 7% |
| Maori Party | 3% | 3% | 2% |
| ACT | 3% | 1% | 2% |
| New Zealand First | 2% | 2% | 1% |
Source: Colmar Brunton / One News
Methodology: Telephone interviews with 1,001 New Zealand voters, conducted from Jul. 25 to Jul. 29, 2009. Margin of error is 3.1 per cent.
Which of these candidates would you vote for in the next presidential election?
|
| Sept. 2009 | Mar. 2009 | Jan. 2009 |
| Jose Serra (PSDB) | 39.5% | 45.7% | 42.8% |
| Dilma Rousseff (PT) | 19.0% | 16.3% | 13.5% |
| Heloisa Helena (PSOL) | 9.7% | 11.0% | 11.2% |
| Marina Silva (PV) | 4.8% | n.a. | n.a. |
| None / Blank ballot | 14.4% | 16.7% | 16.5% |
| Not sure / Undecided | 12.8% | 10.3% | 16.1% |
Source: Instituto Sensus
Methodology: Interviews with 2,000 Brazilian adults, conducted from Aug. 31 to Sept. 4, 2009. Margin of error is 3 per cent.
| 2010 US Senate | Ayotte | Hodes | Undecided |
| All voters | 41% | 34% | 25% |
| Republicans | 84% | 8% | 8% |
| Democrats | 9% | 83% | 9% |
| Undeclared | 34% | 17% | 49% |
| Men | 37% | 32% | 31% |
| Women | 44% | 36% | 20% |
Delaware Survey of 500 Likely Voters
September 30, 2009
| 2010 Delaware Senate Race | |
|---|---|
Christine O'Donnell (R) | 40% |
Beau Biden (D) | 49% |
Some Other Candidate | 3% |
Not Sure | 8% |
| 2010 Delaware Senate Race | |
|---|---|
Mike Castle (R) | 47% |
Beau Biden (D) | 42% |
Some Other Candidate | 5% |
Not Sure | 6% |
Image via Wikipedia
Do you approve or disapprove of Alan García’s performance as president?
|
| Sept. 2009 | Aug. 2009 | Jul. 2009 |
| Approve | 28% | 27% | 27% |
| Disapprove | 67% | 69% | 68% |
Source: Ipsos, Apoyo, Opinión y Mercado / El Comercio
Methodology: Interviews with 1,000 Peruvian adults in 15 cities, conducted from Sept. 16 to Sept. 18, 2009. Margin of error is 3.1 per cent.
If an election were held today which party would receive your party vote?
| Sept. 13 | Aug. 30 | Aug. 16 | |
| National | 51.5% | 56.5% | 53.5% |
| Labour | 33.5% | 29.5% | 32.5% |
| Greens | 7.5% | 8% | 8.5% |
| Maori Party | 2.5% | 1.5% | 2% |
| 2.5% | 1.5% | 2% | |
| ACT | 2% | 1% | 1% |
| Progressives | 0.5% | 0.5% | -- |
| United Future | -- | 0.5% | 0.5% |
Source: Roy Morgan International
Methodology: Telephone interviews with 854 New Zealand voters, conducted from Aug. 31 to Sept. 13, 2009. No margin of error was provided.
What party would you support in Greece’s next general election?
(Decided Voters)
| Pan-Hellenic Socialist Movement (PASOK) | 42.3% |
| New Democracy (ND) | 34.8% |
| Communist Party of Greece (KKE) | 8.2% |
| People’s Orthodox Alarm (LAOS) | 6.2% |
| Coalition of the Radical Left (SYR) | 4.1% |
| Ecologist Greens (OP) | 2.3% |
| Other parties | 2.1% |
Source: MARC / Alpha TV
Methodology: Interviews with 1,001 Greek adults, conducted from Sept. 14 to Sept. 17, 2009. No margin of error was provided.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.
We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
The 56 signatures on the Declaration appear in the positions indicated:
Column 1
Georgia:
Button Gwinnett
Lyman Hall
George Walton
Column 2
North Carolina:
William Hooper
Joseph Hewes
John Penn
South Carolina:
Edward Rutledge
Thomas Heyward, Jr.
Thomas Lynch, Jr.
Arthur Middleton
Column 3
Massachusetts:
John Hancock
Maryland:
Samuel Chase
William Paca
Thomas Stone
Charles Carroll of Carrollton
Virginia:
George Wythe
Richard Henry Lee
Thomas Jefferson
Benjamin Harrison
Thomas Nelson, Jr.
Francis Lightfoot Lee
Carter Braxton
Column 4
Pennsylvania:
Robert Morris
Benjamin Rush
Benjamin Franklin
John Morton
George Clymer
James Smith
George Taylor
James Wilson
George Ross
Delaware:
Caesar Rodney
George Read
Thomas McKean
Column 5
New York:
William Floyd
Philip Livingston
Francis Lewis
Lewis Morris
New Jersey:
Richard Stockton
John Witherspoon
Francis Hopkinson
John Hart
Abraham Clark