Wednesday, September 30, 2009

The Bill of Rights

Bill of Rights

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

The Declaration of Independence


IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.


The 56 signatures on the Declaration appear in the positions indicated:

Column 1
Georgia:
Button Gwinnett
Lyman Hall
George Walton

Column 2
North Carolina:
William Hooper
Joseph Hewes
John Penn
South Carolina:
Edward Rutledge
Thomas Heyward, Jr.
Thomas Lynch, Jr.
Arthur Middleton

Column 3
Massachusetts:
John Hancock
Maryland:
Samuel Chase
William Paca
Thomas Stone
Charles Carroll of Carrollton
Virginia:
George Wythe
Richard Henry Lee
Thomas Jefferson
Benjamin Harrison
Thomas Nelson, Jr.
Francis Lightfoot Lee
Carter Braxton

Column 4
Pennsylvania:
Robert Morris
Benjamin Rush
Benjamin Franklin
John Morton
George Clymer
James Smith
George Taylor
James Wilson
George Ross
Delaware:
Caesar Rodney
George Read
Thomas McKean

Column 5
New York:
William Floyd
Philip Livingston
Francis Lewis
Lewis Morris
New Jersey:
Richard Stockton
John Witherspoon
Francis Hopkinson
John Hart
Abraham Clark

Column 6
New Hampshire:
Josiah Bartlett
William Whipple
Massachusetts:
Samuel Adams
John Adams
Robert Treat Paine
Elbridge Gerry
Rhode Island:
Stephen Hopkins
William Ellery
Connecticut:
Roger Sherman
Samuel Huntington
William Williams
Oliver Wolcott
New Hampshire:
Matthew Thornton
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

New Jersey: 3rd Party Candidate May Help Keep Corzine Corruption Machine in Office

Democratic incumbent Gov. Jon Corzine has cut Republican challenger Christopher Christie's lead in half and now trails the former federal prosecutor 43 - 39 percent among New Jersey likely voters, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today. Independent candidate Christopher Daggett has 12 points, with 6 percent undecided.
Quinnipiac

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Virginia: McDonnell Extends Lead Over Deeds

2009 Virginia Governor's Race

Robert McDonnell (R)

51%

Creigh Deeds (D)

42%

Some Other Candidate

1%

Not Sure

7%


Source: Rasmussen Reports

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Great Britain: Conservatives Keep Large Lead Over Labour

If there were a general election tomorrow, which party would you vote for?

Sept. 11

Aug. 14

Jul. 17

Conservative

41%

42%

42%

Labour

27%

28%

25%

Liberal Democrats

17%

18%

18%

Other

15%

13%

15%


Source: YouGov


Methodology: Online interviews with 2,009 British voters, conducted on Sept. 10 and Sept. 11, 2009. No margin of error was provided.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Poll: Palestinians Want 2 State Solution

Detailed map of Israeli settlements on the Wes...Image via Wikipedia

Here are several options for a Palestinian State. Please tell me which option you would prefer most.

A Palestinian State in the West Bank and Gaza, separate from Israel

55%

A Palestinian state with final borders including land swaps alongside the Israeli state now with all other issues such as Jerusalem, refugees, and settlements to be negotiated

37%

Status quo continues until all these issues have been negotiated and agreed

27%

A Palestinian state with provisional borders alongside the Israeli state now with all other issues such as Jerusalem, refugees, and settlements to be negotiated

14%

Palestine joins a confederation with Jordan and Egypt with shared defense and foreign policy

11%

One state shared by both Palestinians and Israelis

11%

Source: International Peace Institute/ Charney Research

Methodology: Interviews with 2,402 Palestinian adults in West Bank and Gaza, conducted from Jun. 23 to Jul. 27, 2009. No margin of error was provided.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Monday, September 28, 2009

Ohio: Portman Leads Fisher by 1, Brunner by 2

Rob Portman, Director of the Office of Managem...Image via Wikipedia

Ohio Survey of 500 Likely Voters
September 23, 2009

Portman (R)

41%

Fisher (D)

40%

Other

6%

Not Sure

14%

Portman (R)

40%

Brunner (D)

38%

Other

5%

Not Sure

18%


Rasmussen Reports
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Ohio: Kasich Leads Strickland by 1

Kasich's websiteImage by Wild Goose via Flickr

John Kasich is winning buy a modest 1 point, but keep in mind that with the undecideds usually turning against the incumbent, Kasich is close to 50%.

2010 Ohio Governor Race

John Kasich(R)

46%

Ted Strickland(D)

45%

Some Other Candidate

3%

Not Sure

7%



Source: Rasmussen Reports

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Australian Sheep: Almost 2/3 Approve of Statist Kevin Rudd Government

Federal Labor leader Kevin RuddImage via Wikipedia


Are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the way Kevin Rudd is doing his job as prime minister?


Sept. 22

Aug. 23

Aug. 9

Satisfied

65%

61%

60%

Dissatisfied

24%

29%

28%

Uncommitted

11%

10%

12%

Are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the way Malcolm Turnbull is doing his job as leader of the opposition?


Sept. 22

Aug. 23

Aug. 9

Satisfied

33%

30%

26%

Dissatisfied

50%

56%

57%

Uncommitted

17%

14%

17%

Who do you think would make the better prime minister?


Sept. 22

Aug. 23

Aug. 9

Kevin Rudd (ALP)

65%

66%

65%

Malcolm Turnbull (Lib.)

17%

19%

17%

Uncommitted

18%

15%

18%

Source: Newspoll / The Australian
Methodology: Telephone interviews with 1,150 Australian voters, conducted from Sept.18 to Sept. 20, 2009. Margin of error is 3 per cent.


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Britain: Libyan Screw-Up Sinks Gordon Brown Even Lower

PM with Colonel QadhafiImage by Downing Street via Flickr


Polling Data

From what you know about Gordon Brown's dealings with Libya has it improved your opinion of him lessened it or has it made no difference?

Improved

5%

Lessened

43%

Don’t know

8%

Source: YouGov
Methodology: Online interviews with 2,009 British voters, conducted on Sept. 10 and Sept. 11, 2009. No margin of error was provided.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Thursday, September 24, 2009

Uruguay: Statist Parties Extend Lead Over Conservatives

If the presidential and parliamentary elections took place this Sunday, which party would you vote for?

Sept. 2009

Aug. 2009

Jul. 2009

Progressive Encounter - Broad Front (EP-FA)

45%

44%

42%

National Party-Whites (PN-B)

32%

35%

36%

Red Party (PC)

11%

10%

10%

Independent Party (PI)

2%

2%

2%

Undecided / Other

10%

9%

10%

Source: Interconsult / Últimas Noticias
Methodology: Interviews to 900 Uruguayan aged 17 and older, conducted from Sept. 12 to Sept. 14, 2009. Margin of error is 3.4 per cent
.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Peru: Most Citizens See Bolivia as Enemy

Do you think the government of Bolivia is a friend or an enemy of Peru?

Friend

16%

Enemy

68%

Not sure

16%

Do you think the people of Bolivia are friends or enemies of the people of Peru?

Friends

36%

Enemies

46%

Not sure

18%

Source: Ipsos, Apoyo, Opinión y Mercado / El Comercio
Methodology: Interviews with 1,000 Peruvian adults in 15 cities, conducted from Sept. 16 to Sept. 18, 2009. Margin of error is 3.1 per cent.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Missouri: Blunt, Carnahan are Tied

Roy Blunt, member of the United States House o...Image via Wikipedia

Missouri Survey of 500 Likely Voters
September 21, 2009

2010 Missouri Senate Race

Roy Blunt (R)

46%

Robin Carnahan (D)

46%

Some Other Candidate

2%

Not Sure

5%


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Iowa: Culver Losing to Branstad & Vander Plaats

Iowa Survey of 500 Likely Voters
September 22, 2009

2010 Iowa Governor's Race

Terry Branstad (R)

54%

Chet Culver (D)

34%

Some Other Candidate

8%

Not Sure

4%

2010 Iowa Governor's Race

Bob Vander Plaats (R)

43%

Chet Culver (D)

39%

Some Other Candidate

9%

Not Sure

9%


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Friday, September 18, 2009

Americans Against Nationalization of Private Business

Do you favor or oppose the Federal government taking partial ownership of private

companies to prevent them from going out of business?

Favor

27%

Oppose

71%

Don’t know

2%

How about if the failure of the company would seriously harm the economy, would you

favor or oppose the Federal government taking partial ownership of private companies

to prevent them from going out of business?

Favor

38%

Oppose

60%

Don’t know

2%

Source: National Constitution Center / Associated Press



Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Only Small Minority Believe Opposition to Obamacare is Racist

Doctor ObamaImage by Fresh Conservative via Flickr


Survey of 1,000 Likely Voters
September 14-15, 2009

Are most people who oppose the President’s health care plan doing so because they are racist?

Yes

12%

No

67%

Not sure

21%


Rasmussen Reports



Share on Twitter


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Jew-Hating Jimmy Carter Calls Joe Wilson a 'Racist'

Jimmy Carter on bicycle.Image via Wikipedia

"I think it's based on racism," Carter said in response to an audience question at a town hall held at his presidential center in Atlanta. "There is an inherent feeling among many in this country that an African-American should not be president."

Associated Press

Share on Twitter


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

New Jersey: Corzine Getting Less Than 2/3 of Democrat Votes

CAMDEN, NJ- MAY 8:  U.S. Attorney Christopher ...Image by Getty Images via Daylife

That's how a Republican wins in New Jersey.
Also, independent candidate Chris Daggett takes away votes from both Corzine and Christie.

Christie 44
Corzine 35
Daggett 13

Real Clear Politics


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Nevada: Reid Trails Lowden, Tarkanian in Rasmussen Poll

Harry Reid"I must really SUCK!!!" Image via Wikipedia

Survey of 500 Likely Voters in NV
September 14, 2009

Election 2010: Nevada Senate Race

Sue Lowden (R)

50%

Harry Reid (D)

40%

Some other candidate

4%

Not sure

5%

Election 2010: Nevada Senate Race

Danny Tarkanian (R)

50%

Harry Reid (D)

43%

Other

4%

Not sure

3%

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Mexico: People More Confident in War on Drugs

A box of CannabisImage via Wikipedia

Who do you think is winning the war against drug trafficking?


Aug. 2009

Aug. 2008

Organized crime

41%

61%

The government

37%

22%

Neither / Not sure

22%

17%

Source: Reforma
Methodology: Face-to-face interviews with 1,515 Mexican registered voters, conducted from Aug. 14 to Aug. 16, 2009. Margin of error is 2.8 per cent.


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

United Kingdom: Conservatives Continue to Hold Strong Lead

David Cameron is a British politician, Leader ...Image via Wikipedia

If there were a general election tomorrow, which party would you vote for?


Aug. 28

Aug. 14

Jul. 17

Conservative

42%

42%

42%

Labour

28%

28%

25%

Liberal Democrats

17%

18%

18%

Other

13%

13%

15%

Source: YouGov
Methodology: Online interviews with 1,996 British voters, conducted on Aug. 27 and Aug. 28, 2009. No margin of error was provided.


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

The Interested Archive