In a close election, Ohio’s 20 electoral votes could swing into McCain’s [yeah, right] or Obama’s column based on the ballots of non-Ohioans, foreign citizens, felons, or even children. If, in a photo finish, the presidency hinges on such tainted Ohio votes, McCain or Obama could be inaugurated beneath a thundercloud. Fairly or not, cries of “Thief!” will haunt him wherever he goes. Not surprisingly, such grievances grind democracy down. So it goes when our leaders govern with the consent of those who never should have been asked.
Deroy Murdock
Monday, October 6, 2008
Ohio: Voter Fraud Already Occuring
Latest Racist Comment by an Obama Pal
"A black friend in the White House or a white enemy."
—Cecil E. Roberts, Virginia Obama Supporter
Los Angeles Times, Fourth Paragraph.
—Cecil E. Roberts, Virginia Obama Supporter
Los Angeles Times, Fourth Paragraph.
Union Bosses Selling Out Workers in Exchange for Obama $
Are you or someone you love in a union? Did you know that Barack Obama and corrupt union bosses are trying to screw the everyday American worker by taking away a worker's right to a private vote?
If Obama is elected president, get ready for a unionized America and the end of the worker's right to a secret ballot.
If he gets his way, Obama is ready to force millions of Americans into unions by eliminating, for all practical purposes, this fundamental American right.
Obama is a strong supporter of the falsely-named “Employee Free Choice Act” (also known as the Card Check bill) sponsored by Ted Kennedy. It almost passed Congress this year and is certain to become law if Obama becomes president. Obama told the AFL-CIO this year, "I will make it the law of the land when I’m president of the United States." (President Bush has threatened to veto the legislation.)
Read entire horror story at Human Events
Sunday, October 5, 2008
Hillary Attacked Obama on Ayers Relationship in April
"Obama served on a board with former Weather Underground member William Ayers and "that relationship with Mr. Ayers on this board continued after 9/11."
Hillary Rodham Clinton
Canadian Debate: Anglos Think Harper Won, Froggies Think Dion Won
If you had to pick only one leader, who do you think won the debate?
| English | French | |
| Stephen Harper - Con. | 34% | 10% |
| Jack Layton - NDP | 19% | 15% |
| Stéphane Dion - Lib. | 14% | 32% |
| Elizabeth May - Grn. | 13% | 2% |
| Giles Duceppe - BQ | 1% | 27% |
| None of them | 21% | 14% |
Source: Angus Reid Strategies / Toronto Star
Methodology: Online interviews with 1,635 Canadian adults who saw the English language debate on Oct. 2, and 429 Canadian adults who saw the French language debate on Oct. 1. The interviews for respondents who watched the English-language debate were collected AFTER the entire English-language debate was over. The interviews for respondents who watched the French-language debate were collected AFTER the entire French-language debate was over. Margin of error for the total sample of debate watchers is 2.2 per cent.
Maine Anomaly Scares Obama Gang
While many polls during the past week and a half have shown Obama gaining in battleground states, Maine is moving in favor of McCain. With the race as close as it is, if McCain is able to peel of the 1 electoral vote from the northern congressional district he will be able to avoid the dreaded 269-269 tie that many people have been talking about. A situation like this would probably end up in Obama's favor, because then it would be up to each state's congressional delegation to cast 1 vote for president—only 1 vote, no matter how small or large the delegation. Since the liberals are likely to have more delegations than the Republicans, Obama would most likely be picked as president. But a single district in Maine can change all that by making it 270 to 268 in favor of McCain.
It does not get any closer than that—without a civil war breaking out.
It does not get any closer than that—without a civil war breaking out.
Ohio: McCain Leads by 1
Angus-Reid Global Associates has compiled a long list of recent Ohio Polls:
McCain (R) | Obama (D) | Other / Not sure | Dat | |
| (32) SurveyUSA | 49% | 48% | 3% | Sept. 28-29 |
| (31) Quinnipiac University | 42% | 50% | 8% | Sept. 27-29 |
| (30) Insider Advantage | 45% | 47% | 8% | Sept. 29 |
| (29) Rasmussen Reports | 48% | 47% | 5% | Sept. 28 |
| (28) Rasmussen Reports | 47% | 46% | 7% | Sept. 24 |
| (27) Insider Advantage | 46% | 46% | 8% | Sept. 23 |
| (26) Rasmussen Reports | 50% | 46% | 4% | Sept. 21 |
| (25) University of Wisc-Mad | 45% | 46% | 9% | Sept. 14-17 |
| (24) Marist College | 45% | 47% | 8% | Sept. 11-15 |
| (23) FD / National Journal | 42% | 41% | 17% | Sept. 11-15 |
| (22) Opinion Research Corp. | 47% | 49% | 4% | Sept. 13-14 |
| (21) Public Policy Polling | 48% | 44% | 8% | Sept. 13-14 |
| (20) Rasmussen Reports | 48% | 45% | 7% | Sept. 14 |
| (19) Zogby Interactive | 50% | 44% | 6% | Sept. 9-12 |
| (18) Suffolk University | 46% | 42% | 12% | Sept. 10-13 |
| (17) Insider Advantage | 48% | 47% | 5% | Sept. 9-10 |
| (16) University of Cincinnati | 48% | 44% | 8% | Sept. 5-10 |
| (15) Strategic Vision | 48% | 44% | 8% | Sept. 7-9 |
| (14) Quinnipiac University | 44% | 49% | 7% | Sept. 7-9 |
| (13) Rasmussen Reports | 51% | 44% | 5% | Sept. 7 |
| (12) Opinion Research Corp. | 45% | 47% | 8% | Aug. 31-Sept. 2 |
| (11) Quinnipiac University | 43% | 44% | 13% | Aug. 17-24 |
| (10) Columbis Dispatch | 42% | 41% | 17% | Aug. 12-21 |
| (9) Rasmussen Reports | 48% | 43% | 8% | Aug. 18 |
| (8) Public Policy Polling | 45% | 45% | 10% | Aug. 12-14 |
| (7) Quinnipiac University | 44% | 46% | 10% | Jul. 23-29 |
| (6) Rasmussen Reports | 46% | 40% | 14% | Jul. 21 |
| (5) Public Policy Polling | 40% | 48% | 12% | Jul. 17-20 |
| (4) SurveyUSA | 46% | 48% | 7% | Jun. 20-22 |
| (3) Rasmussen Reports | 44% | 43% | 14% | Jun. 17 |
| (2) Quinnipiac University | 42% | 48% | 10% | Jun. 9-16 |
| (1) Public Policy Polling | 39% | 50% | 11% | Jun. 14-15 |
(32) SurveyUSA - Telephone interviews with 693 likely Ohio voters, conducted on Sept. 28 and Sept. 29, 2008. Margin of error is 3.8 per cent.
(31) Quinnipiac University Polling Institute - Telephone interviews with 825 likely Ohio voters, conducted from Sept. 27 to Sept. 29, 2008. Margin of error is 3.4 per cent.
(30) Insider Advantage - Telephone interviews with 512 likely Ohio voters, conducted on Sept. 29, 2008. Margin of error is 4 per cent.
(29) Rasmussen Reports - Telephone interviews with 500 likely Ohio voters, conducted on Sept. 28, 2008. Margin of error is 4.5 per cent.
(28) Rasmussen Reports - Telephone interviews with 700 likely Ohio voters, conducted on Sept. 24, 2008. Margin of error is 4 per cent.
(27) Insider Advantage - Telephone interviews with 545 likely Ohio voters, conducted on Sept. 23, 2008. Margin of error is 4.1 per cent.
(26) Rasmussen Reports - Telephone interviews with 500 likely Ohio voters, conducted on Sept. 21, 2008. Margin of error is 4.5 per cent.
(25) University of Wisconsin-Madison - Telephone interviews with 619 registered Ohio voters, conducted from Sept. 14 to Sept. 17, 2008. Margin of error is 4 per cent.
(24) Marist College Institute for Public Opinion - Telephone interviews with 565 registered Ohio voters, conducted from Sept. 11 to Sept. 15, 2008. Margin of error is 4 per cent.
(23) FD / National Journal - Telephone interviews with 400 registered Ohio voters, conducted from Sept. 11 to Sept. 15, 2008. Margin of error is 5 per cent.
(22) Opinion Research Corporation - Telephone interviews with 913 registered Ohio voters, conducted on Sept. 13 and Sept. 14, 2008. Margin of error is 3 per cent.
(21) Public Policy Polling - Telephone interviews with 1077 likely Ohio voters, conducted on Sept. 13 and Sept. 14, 2008. Margin of error is 3 per cent.
(20) Rasmussen Reports - Telephone interviews with 500 likely Ohio voters, conducted on Sept. 14, 2008. Margin of error is 4.5 per cent.
(19) Zogby Interactive - Online interviews with 847 likely Ohio voters, conducted on Sept. 9 to Sept. 12, 2008. Margin of error is 3.4 per cent.
(18) Suffolk University - Telephone interviews with 600 likely voters in Ohio conducted from Sept. 10 to Sept. 13, 2008. Margin of error is 4 per cent.
(17) Insider Advantage - Telephone interviews with 503 likely voters in Ohio conducted on Sept. 9 and Sept. 10, 2008. Margin of error is 4.3 per cent.
(16) University of Cincinnati - Telephone interviews with 775 likely voters in Ohio conducted from Sept. 5 to Sept. 10, 2008. Margin of error is 3.5 per cent.
(15) Strategic Vision - Telephone interviews with 1200 likely voters in Ohio conducted from Sept. 7 to Sept. 9, 2008. Margin of error is 3.0 per cent.
(14) Quinnipiac University - Telephone interviews with 1,367 likely voters in Ohio conducted from Sept. 5 to Sept. 9, 2008. Margin of error is 2.7 per cent.
(13) Rasmussen Reports - Telephone interviews with 500 likely Ohio voters, conducted on Sept. 7, 2008. Margin of error is 4.5 per cent.
(12) Opinion Research Corporation - Telephone interviews with 685 registered Ohio voters, conducted from Aug. 31 to Sept. 2, 2008. Margin of error is 3.5 per cent.
(11) Quinnipiac University - Telephone interviews with 1,234 likely voters in Ohio, conducted from Aug. 17 to Aug. 24, 2008. Margin of error is 2.8 per cent.
(10) Columbus Dispatch - Mail survey with 2,102 registered voters in Ohio, conducted from Aug. 11 to Aug. 21, 2008. Margin of error is 2.2 per cent.
(9) Rasmussen Reports - Telephone interviews with 700 likely voters in Ohio, conducted on Aug. 18, 2008. Margin of error is 4 per cent.
(8) Public Policy Polling - Telephone interviews with 950 likely Ohio voters, conducted from Aug. 12 to Aug. 14, 2008. Margin of error is 3.2 per cent.
(7) Quinnipiac University Polling Institute - Telephone interviews with 1,229 likely voters in Ohio, conducted from Jul. 23 to Jul. 29, 2008. Margin of error is 2.8 per cent.
(6) Rasmussen Reports - Telephone interviews with 500 likely voters in Ohio, conducted on Jul. 21, 2008. Margin of error is 4.5 per cent.
(5) Public Policy Polling - Telephone interviews to 1,058 likely Ohio voters, conducted from Jul. 17 to Jul. 20, 2008. Margin of error is 3 per cent.
(4) SurveyUSA - Telephone interviews with 580 likely voters in Ohio, conducted from Jun. 20 to Jun. 22, 2008. Margin of error is 4.2 per cent.
(3) Rasmussen Reports - Telephone interviews with 500 likely voters in Ohio, conducted on Jun. 17, 2008. Margin of error is 4 per cent.
(2) Quinnipiac University - Telephone interviews with 1,396 registered voters in Ohio, conducted from Jun. 9 to Jun. 16, 2008. Margin of error is 2.6 per cent.
(1) Public Policy Polling - Telephone interviews to 733 likely Ohio voters, conducted on Jun. 14 and Jun. 15, 2008. Margin of error is 4 per cent.
Minnesota Star Tribune Sabotaging Own Poll to Help Obama?
Just a couple of days ago, Survey USA released a polls from Minnesota showing Republican US Senator Norm Coleman ahead of Democrat Al Franken by double digits and John McCain actually ahead of Obama by 1%. A couple of days later, the Minnesota Start Tribune claims it is Franken who leads Coleman by 9% and Obama is ahead of McCain by a ridiculous 18%.—The Hedgehog Report
Friday, October 3, 2008
George Stephanobamaspoodleyesheis: Predictably Crowns Yet Another Liberal the Winner of a Debate
"As a reporter, I prefer not to use my
eyes and ears in the course of my duties.
Instead, I like to use my imagination."
Illinois: Palin Haters Admit She Held Her Own
Click the link above to see what a bunch of spoiled young white girls had to say about Sarah Palin's debate performance.
(Hmm... as you'll see in the accompanying photo, these skanks are about 20 years younger than Palin, but Sarah is 20 times hotter than them. Jealousy?)
(Hmm... as you'll see in the accompanying photo, these skanks are about 20 years younger than Palin, but Sarah is 20 times hotter than them. Jealousy?)
Financial Problems Raising Anti-Semitism?
"The age-old canards about Jews and money are always just beneath the surface," said Abraham Foxman, the national director of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), which fights anti-semitism.
Thursday, October 2, 2008
Sarah Palin Wins Vice Presidential Debate
The Luntz focus group picked up the decisive Palin win, and Luntz is predicting a move towards McCain in the polls as a result. McCain will have to take on the issue of the origins of the subprime crisis to capitalize on this opening, and Sarah needs to be out on talk radio every day from here on out. She is back as the GOP's best weapon in Election '08.
Hugh Hewitt
Latest Harry Reid Blunder Causes Insurance Stocks to Plummet
"We don't have a lot of leeway on time. One of the individuals in the caucus today talked about a major insurance company. A major insurance company -- one with a name that everyone knows that's on the verge of going bankrupt. That's what this is all about."Since the irresponsible Senator Reid would not name names, the entire industry took a beating today.
CNN
Rasmussen: McCain Lead in Nebraska Grows
Nebraska Trends: McCain vs. Obama | ||
|---|---|---|
Date | McCain | Obama |
09/30/2008 | 56% | 37% |
50% | 32% | |
52% | 36% | |
50% | 39% | |
Reuters: Catholic Church Claims Democrats Are 'Party of Death'
“Lately, I’ve noticed that other bishops are coming to this position,” [Archbishop Raymond] Burke told Avvenire, which is owned by the Italian bishops’ conference.
LA Times Warns Democrats Not To Underestimate Palin
"The political landscape here is littered with people who have underestimated Sarah Palin," said Eric Croft, a former state representative who ran for the Democratic nomination for governor in 2006 and appeared with Palin during several early forums.
4 Weathermen Terrorists Endorse Obama
Among the names signed onto the petition are former Weathermen leaders Howard Machtinger, Jeff Jones, Steve Tappis and Mark Rudd.
WorldNetDaily
Virginia: McCain Reclaims 3 pt Lead
McCain’s largest regional advantage is in the rural Shenandoah Valley and Piedmont, where he leads, 59-36. Obama’s biggest – and only – lead is in Northern Virginia, the state’s most populous area, where he is ahead, 57-37.
HamptonRoads.com
Colorado: McCain Closes Gap to 1 pt
Colorado Trends: McCain vs. Obama | ||
|---|---|---|
Date | McCain | Obama |
09/28/2008 | 48% | 49% |
47% | 50% | |
48% | 46% | |
46% | 49% | |
47% | 45% | |
42% | 49% | |
41% | 43% | |
42% | 48% | |
43% | 46% | |
46% | 46% | |
39% | 46% | |
Rasmussen Reports
North Carolina: McCrory Takes Over Lead
North Carolina Trends: Pat McCrory vs. Bev Perdue | ||
|---|---|---|
Date | McCrory | Perdue |
9/30/2008 | 50% | 46% |
43% | 49% | |
46% | 47% | |
45% | 39% | |
42% | 45% | |
38% | 42% | |
Source: Rasmussen Reports
Tuesday, September 30, 2008
Disturbing Video: Children as Young as 5 Forced to Memorize, Sing Obama Song
I posted this comment on YouTube, on the page the video appears:
This should have taken place at night in an open air stadium, with torches blazing and Obamstika flags fluttering in the breeze.
I bet the post will be taken down, just like our free speech will be taken down by the so-called "Fairness Doctrine" if Obama wins.
Here's the creepy video:
Notice the O-Hole logos the kids had placed on them.
UPDATE: The link in my headline to the story on Obama's web site has been taken down.
What's A Hillary Supporter to Do?
If you are a PUMA, there are 4 actions you can choose from:
1. Don't vote
2. Write in Hillary's name
3. Vote for a third-party candidate
4. Vote for John McCain
So what should a die-hard Hillary Supporter do? How do they play this game of making sure Obama does not win so Hillary can be president in 4 years?
1. Not voting does nothing to help Hillary.
2. Writing Hillary's name in helps, you give 1/2 a point to Hillary by taking away a vote from Obama.
3. The same goes for voting for a third-party candidate, 1/2 a point for Hillary.
4. But if you vote for McCain, you give Hillary a whole point. The 1/2 point you take from Obama, and the 1/2 you give to McCain equals a full vote swing. The other 3 options do not add up to fully using your vote to help Hillary.
Therefore, PUMAs truly in the know will vote for McCain... and not tell too many people about it!
Germans Still Like Conservative Coalition
Angela MerkelWhat party would you vote for in the next federal election?
| Sept. 17 | Aug. 20 | Aug. 6 | |
| Christian-Democratic Union (CDU) / | 37% | 37% | 36% |
| Social Democratic Party (SPD) | 26% | 25% | 24% |
| Left Party (Linke) | 12% | 13% | 14% |
| Free Democratic Party (FDP) | 12% | 12% | 12% |
| Green Party (Grune) | 10% | 10% | 11% |
Source: Infratest-Dimap
Methodology: Telephone interviews with 1,000 German voters, conducted on Sept. 16 to Sept. 17, 2008. Margin of error is 2.5 per cent.
McCain Makes Modest Gains in Iowa
McCain (R) | Obama (D) | Other / Not sure | Date | |
| (12) Rasmussen Reports | 43% | 51% | 6% | Sept. 25 |
| (11) Marist College | 41% | 51% | 8% | Sept. 18-21 |
| (10) Research 2000 | 39% | 53% | 8% | Sept. 15-17 |
| (9) SurveyUSA | 43% | 54% | 3% | Sept. 17-18 |
| (8) University of Wisc-Mad | 45% | 45% | 10% | Sept. 14-17 |
| (7) Selzer & Co. | 40% | 52% | 8% | Sept. 8-10 |
| (6) Opinion Research Corp. | 40% | 55% | 5% | Aug. 31-Sept. 2 |
| (5) Univ. of Iowa | 43% | 50% | 7% | Aug. 4-13 |
| (4) Rasmussen Reports | 44% | 49% | 7% | Aug. 7 |
| (3) Rasmussen Reports | 38% | 48% | 14% | Jul. 10 |
| (2) SurveyUSA | 45% | 49% | 6% | Jun. 13-16 |
| (1) Rasmussen Reports | 38% | 45% | 16% | Jun. 10 |
(12) Rasmussen Reports - Telephone interviews with 700 likely Iowa voters, conducted on Sept. 25, 2008. Margin of error is 4 per cent.
(11) Marist College Institute for Public Opinion - Telephone interviews with 467 likely Iowa voters, conducted from Sept. 18 to Sept. 21, 2008. Margin of error is 4.5 per cent.
(10) Research 2000 - Telephone interviews with 600 likely Iowa voters, conducted from Sept. 15 to Sept. 17, 2008. Margin of error is 4 per cent.
(9) SurveyUSA - Telephone interviews with 702 likely Iowa voters, conducted on Sept. 17 and Sept. 18, 2008. Margin of error is 3.8 per cent.
(8) University of Wisconsin-Madison - Telephone interviews with 643 registered Iowa voters, conducted from Sept 14 to Sept. 17, 2008. Margin of error is 4 per cent.
(7) Selzer & Co. - Telephone interviews with 616 likely Iowa voters, conducted from Sept. 8 to Sept. 10, 2008. Margin of error is 4 per cent.
(6) Opinion Research Corporation - Telephone interviews with 828 registered Iowa voters, conducted from Aug. 31 to Sept. 2, 2008. Margin of error is 3.5 per cent.
(5) University of Iowa - Telephone interviews with 617 likely Iowa voters, conducted from Aug. 4 to Aug. 13, 2008. Margin of error is 4 per cent.
(4) Rasmussen Reports - Telephone interviews with 700 likely Iowa voters, conducted on Aug. 7, 2008. Margin of error is 4 per cent.
(3) Rasmussen Reports - Telephone interviews with 500 likely Iowa voters, conducted on Jul. 10, 2008. Margin of error is 4.1 per cent.
(2) SurveyUSA - Telephone interviews with 528 likely Iowa voters, conducted from Jun. 13 to Jun. 16, 2008. Margin of error is 4.4 per cent.
(1) Rasmussen Reports - Telephone interviews with 500 likely Iowa voters, conducted on Jun. 10, 2008. Margin of error is 4.1 per cent.
Compiled by Angus-Reid Global Monitor
Monday, September 29, 2008
McCain Clean Coal Ads From 4 States
And those 4 states would be:
Pennsylvania
Virginia
Ohio
Colorado
This reinforces what most people already know—these states are battlegrounds.
Pennsylvania
Virginia
Ohio
Colorado
This reinforces what most people already know—these states are battlegrounds.
McCain Ad Sends Obama Into Panic Mode
At the time of this writing, over half a million people have seen this ad on Youtube.
And by the way, notice that Obama has sent out a lot of his campaign thugs to spend time on Youtube rating the video badly. This can be seen simply by comparing it to the ratings other McCain ads have received. This ad has touched a raw nerve in the Obama camp.
And by the way, notice that Obama has sent out a lot of his campaign thugs to spend time on Youtube rating the video badly. This can be seen simply by comparing it to the ratings other McCain ads have received. This ad has touched a raw nerve in the Obama camp.
Did Pelosi Blow $700 Billion Bail-Out on Purpose to Prolong Economic Crisis?
Pelosi destroys bipartisan agreement,
stock markets plunge.
September 29, 2008
This is Pelosi yesterday:
Then this morning the San Francisco hypocrite stabs America in the back with this attack right before the vote.
This means that all the showboating by Pelosi about trying to honestly get this done was a lie. But since she represents San Francisco, Pelosi is not afraid of your wrath, because you do not get a chance to vote against her.
Christian Pastors Endorse McCain in Protest of IRS Gag Rule
Pastor Luke Emrich prepared his sermon this week knowing his remarks could invite an investigation by the Internal Revenue Service. But that was the whole point, so Emrich forged ahead with his message: Thou shalt vote according to the Scriptures.
"I'm telling you straight up, I would choose life," Emrich told about 100 worshippers Sunday at New Life Church, a nondenominational evangelical congregation about 40 miles from Milwaukee.
"I would cast a vote for John McCain and Sarah Palin," he said. "But friends, it's your choice to make, it's not my choice. I won't be in the voting booth with you."
All told, 33 pastors in 22 states were to make pointed recommendations about political candidates Sunday, an effort orchestrated by the Arizona-based Alliance Defense Fund.
The conservative legal group plans to send copies of the pastors' sermons to the IRS with hope of setting off a legal fight and abolishing restrictions on church involvement in politics. Critics call it unnecessary, divisive and unlikely to succeed.
Read whole story at CBS News.
Rezko May Spill Beans on Obama, Blagojevich
Antoin "Tony" Rezko, a convicted influence peddler who was once one of Gov. Rod Blagojevich's most trusted confidants, has met with federal prosecutors and is considering cooperating in the corruption probe of the governor's administration, sources told the Tribune.
Rezko's possible change of heart—after years of steadfast refusal—has sent ripples through a tight circle of prominent defense attorneys who represent dozens of potential witnesses and targets in the wide-ranging probe.
Continue Story: Chicago Tribune
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)